Movie I Don't Luv U: A Journey from Friendship to Love and Back Again
- discballrenosandss
- Aug 20, 2023
- 8 min read
Says Ruslaan, "It's a college love story with an MMS as the conflict point. It is inspired by the 2004 MMS scandal, where a video of two school goers having sex was leaked on Internet." Model-turned-actress Chetna Pandey plays Ruslaan's co-star in film, and the movie, we hear, will leave little to imagination.
Released on the big screens in the 2013 and with an amazing cast and directed by Amit Kasaria , I Don't Luv U was bound to make big. From drama to emotions to many other elements, I Don't Luv U has got everything to make a movie a huge hit and it stood right up on that. It is one of the finest Romantic drama movies that were released in 2013 and is available in Hindi language
movie I Don 't Luv U
Download File: https://ssurll.com/2vJAuV
Mohe Apne Hi Rang Mein Lyrics from I Dont Luv U (2013): This is a lovely song from I Dont Luv U starring Ruslaan Mumtaz, Chetna Pande, Murli Sharma and Ragesh Asthana. It is sung by Fareed Hasan and composed by Amit Kasaria. I Dont Luv U is a 2013 drama, romantic Hindi movie starring Ruslaan Mumtaz, Chetna Pande, Murli Sharma and Ragesh Asthana. It is produced by Dr. Anil Kumar Sharma and directed by Amit Kasaria. Lyrics of Mohe Apne Hi Rang Mein song is given below.
I know you can't see it, not you, Ed, but maybe if I tell you the whole plot you'll understand it this once, because even now I want you to see it. I don't love you anymore, of course I don't, but there's still something I can show you. You know I want to be a director, but you never truly see the movies in my head and that, Ed, is why we broke up.
Writing a book is often a gateway to other bigger things. Speaking gigs. Article publications. Other bigger books. Maybe a movie deal. I probably get 3-4 queries a week (yes, even when I\u2019m closed) from people saying something like I have this stuff and I want to turn it into a book and get a book deal. They haven\u2019t said I have written a book. They just have a lot of content. Often that\u2019s blog/newsletter posts, tweets, photographs/instagrams, craft patterns, newspaper columns, and screenplays (more on that last one in a minute). A book is not a container you fill to the top with words and sew the binding on. It is not if you write it, they will come. If you\u2019ve spent all year making stuff and think it should be in a book, you can\u2019t just sculpt a 6 x 9 rectangle out of your content and call it a book.
Now, screenplays. I get a good number of queries for screenplays which is bad because I don\u2019t represent screenplays and I\u2019ve read like 2 in my whole life. I don\u2019t know how to write them and I don\u2019t know how to evaluate them and I don\u2019t sell them so basically, sending me these is huge waste of time for all of us. After I tell the querier that I don\u2019t rep screenplays (which is VERY NICE OF ME because I could just delete it) I sometimes get a response that\u2019s like ok but I can just make this into a novel do you want to read that can you help me do that? Uh, no. I cannot do that or help you do that or read that. Tbh, I kinda don\u2019t believe that\u2019s a good idea. I am 100% CERTAIN that there are books out there that started as screenplays and ended up selling and are great and fabulous and I have maybe even read them without knowing. Well done on all parties who did that. But I can\u2019t do that and if your primary goal is to turn your screenplay into a novel so that it will sell and then get made into a movie, then I kinda think your priorities are out of whack. I definitely believe in the novel as art, but not only as art, and it\u2019s not like it\u2019s sacrilege to do this. It\u2019s just probably going to be bad because your aim is not to make a good book, it\u2019s to make a movie, and you can\u2019t make a thing out of a thing. You go forth and make the movie, or you go forth and write the novel. I think Yoda said something like this but I forget because I like Star Trek better.
I believe that this is something that every individual-rich or average income-earner will like to have. Unfortunately, we can see the cost of online streaming and pleasure as two separate experiences. One drains energy, while the other improves your mental health. Watching movies online can create good memories.
The movie has always reminded me that there is something bigger than us, but that sometimes our connection to that power is hard to tangibly identify. Many religious teachings share that we are all connected through something bigger, and should treat each other with kindness and respect. But why does that not apply to the planet Earth? We seem to sometimes forget or fail to see the connection between us and this place we call home.
In this spoiler-filled episode, we give The Rise of Skywalker a thorough going-over. Plus, we discover a not-as-terrible-as-you-might-think addition to our carousel of bad holiday made-for-TV movies. And Phil has a nasty break-up with Jennifer Lawrence.
Phil and Lisa share their thoughts on the latest Disney animated movie, skewer two upcoming releases from Pixar and Disney and tempt violent retribution from fans of Lin-Manuel Miranda and Mandy Patinkin.
INT: Where did the idea for ALIEN come from?WH: It was an original script by a couple of fellas given to me through an intermediary. DAVID GILER and I had a company production deal at FOX. Hoping we would take it on. We thought it was a very crude script. If it was developed we thought it might potentially be a good film. We had the idea at the time, which is commonplace now, that if you did what was always perceived in Hollywood as a B picture with new hyped techniques, terrific photography, in your face dub, better special effects than the crude things used in these films. This was not the first movie that had that kind of story line. You kept it simple and hard, maybe a different reality to the characters. We used to describe it as truckers in space. None of this was in the script. I did a couple of passes. DAVID and I together did a couple. That's what ended up as the final film. We produced it, it was a good film. I think it's still, after all these years I think it's RIDLEY's best movie. I'm proud to be associated with it.
INT: The business, the touch of wistfulness and sadness is a subversive idea in Hollywood?WH: I think it is if you are talking to executives and producers. I think historically it's true. I certainly think the only film, I've done a lot of films that are kinetic. I think I've only done one movie that is perceived to be a flat out comedy and that was BREWSTER'S MILLIONS with PRYOR. Whatever its deficiencies, I think the wistful quality was there. I was happy about that. The picture did well and made money. [INT: Had you not had that, would it have possibly made a little more money?] Possibly, no one knows either. [INT: Even IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE has a wistful quality about it.] Sure. You know, whether it's THE APARTMENT or IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE, any number of LEO MCCAREY movies, this is not something I discovered, this is a known truth for a long time. But I think that people don't like to address it.
INT: This story is a classic director story. It has all the dramatic elements of what it is to be a director. You are hired to do a film which everyone things you are appropriate, then a piece of casting which greed begins to dominate the thinking. Now they see EDDIE MURPHY and they see opportunity. There is the director. before EDDIE MURPHY is on, now he is the wrong person. How did you insulate yourself. Most directors in that situation, how did you steal yourself to get through that movie so that you would still believe you were the right person?WH: I never had a problem with that. I always assumed that most jobs they didn't want me. I just think you have to be very resilient. It's part of this craft. Always looking for somebody, we can't finance our films, somebody who says yes and let's us do it. Nine times out of ten, whoever you ask will say no. You can't let it get to you. I never doubted that I was going to do a reasonable job on the film. I had no idea that EDDIE was going to break through quite the way he did. People say to me what a great discovery, EDDIE really owes you. I always thought the other side of it. Number one he was a tremendous talent. I was just the guy who was smart enough to use him, but if I hadn't someone else would. The second thing is EDDIE could have killed me. Given the politics of the damn thing, if EDDIE had gone to them I would have really had a problem. The fact we were a good shooting company, not in trouble budget-wise, everybody getting along made us a united front. when the studio tried to get into it and the dailies aren't funny as they could have been, we basically said "Fuck you."
INT: What happened when the picture was such a success, did you have a conversation with him?WH: No, never did. They insulated. Signed EDDIE to a long term contract, I went over to UNIVERSAL and did a movie. One of the hardest things, I'm sure you will appreciate this, is two films in a row for the same organization. Usually there is so much blood on the trail you go your own way for a couple of years until they decide they love you again, if they ever decide it. But the truth is they don't love you anyway. You don't love them. [INT: Nobody acknowledged that it was a success.] They acknowledged it, but never came in and say boy you were right, we were wrong. They fashioned it that we listened to them. We have to ask too much to get you to do it right. They all say as funny as it was it wouldn't have been funny if we didn't want it funnier. The stacks of bullshit in the business are endless. Your opponents to doing as good a work as you can do are often very clever people. That's probably the most dispiriting of all. They are not stupid and remedial.
INT: Terrific story. Let's talk about SOUTHERN COMFORT, which is a wonderful film. How did that film happen?WH: DAVID and I, our company at FOX, we had developed a survival story in the swamps. Hired a fella to write a draft and then DAVID and I took it over and rewrote it. No studio wanted to make it, but an independent guy showed up who had a relationship with FOX. Liked it, said he would finance it. You have to get used to rejection. All you need is one person to say yes. Those who say no you forget about. He said yes, if we could make it for 6 million I think. We said yes, whipped down to Louisiana and shot the picture. [INT: Long shoot?] I think it was 55 days. Wasn't short, but it was brutal. As tough a movie as I've ever done. The swamp was the swamp. Putting on the rubber outfit and then wade in and try to shoot. So often you would get a camera position, you had to get a shoot in a couple of minutes before the soft bottom sunk. There was no going back to the trailers for the cast, they had to stand under the tree. Against a Cyprus tree, it was hell. The cast was great, they were a great bunch of guys who did not complain too much. I tried to be disciplined. If I started complaining, then everybody complains. I thought because the weather was terrible, even when it's nice in the film, it was always terrible. 2ff7e9595c
Commentaires